羽矢

[Disclaimer: If you find something ridiculous in the Biographies, it is what it is.]

1. Chuanguo Xiao

Former medical doctor and professor (dismissed), inventor of the “Xiao Procedure”, a surgical procedure that, according to Xiao’s claims, can restore “almost normal storage and synergic voiding” in patients with spinal cord injury [a1], and “can achieve continence and restore bladder function in children with spina bifida” [a2]. His “scientific and humanitarian contributions to the world” were highly commended by his collaborators from the “International Academic Community” in an open letter [a3] in support of Xiao after he was arrested for masterminding violent attacks on science fraud buster Fang Zhouzi and journalist Fang Xuanchang [a4,a5].

His most greatest humanitarian contribution is that, funded by an NIH grant initially awarded for dogs research [a6,a7], he “took the courageous step of moving from animal research to human studies” [a3] on Chinese miners, 4 years before his research paper on cats was published in a peer-reviewed journal [a8]. His another humanitarian contribution is that he and his team had massively practiced his procedure on thousands of Chinese patients [a9], before the procedure was banned by the local health department [a10] following the announcement from the Ministry of Health of China that “the safety and efficacy of the technique still lacks validation in the sense of evidence-based medicine” [a11].

One of his scientific contributions is that, in less than 8 months after his first surgery in his hospital, he creatively found that, “followed up for more than 8 months, 85% of the 60 patients have recovered normal bladder and bowel functions” [a12]. His most significant contribution is that he bravely brought his procedure to the validation by doctors all over the world, although the clinical trials out of China so far have showed that “the clinical benefit of the procedure is not at all similar to (Xiao’s) previous reports” [a13]; “the surgery failed to achieve its primary goal for any of the eight SCI patients” in Germany [a14]; “incontinence still problem in most” of 9 spina bifida patients in the U.S. [a15].

Mr. Xiao is a pioneer Fangologist. He was the first to report Fang Zhouzi’s plagiarism as early as 10 years ago, but unfortunately was dismissed by Science for groundless accusation [a16]. Since then, he has spared no effort in verbal criticism, legal actions, and finally physical strike on Fang, while the latter led to his imprisonment, the removal of his professorship, and the revocation of his medical licence. After getting out of jail, he is still actively engaged in the studies of Fangology, besides promoting his procedure, recruiting patients and remote diagnosis on his blog. Mr. Xiao’s tireless efforts in each of anti-Fang campaigns, especially his experience behind bars, have made him the well-deserved spiritual leader of Fangologists.

Update:
Xiao set up a new hospital in 2012 after previous one was dissolved, regardless of repeated warnings from health officials that he “should not implement the Xiao Procedure without authorization”[a], after the Ministry of Health of China reiterated in Nov. 2010, Apr. 2012 and May 2012 press conferences [a11, a17, a18], that “the safety and efficacy of the technique still lacks validation in the sense of evidence-based medicine” and therefore “should not be implemented in clinical practice”[a17].

2. Xin Ge (Yiming)

Former technician in Plant Biology [b1] and part-time teacher in Elementary Chinese Mandarin [b2] at the University of South Carolina. His greatest contribution to medicine is the invention of a hangover medicine, with expected annual sales of 20 million dollars [b3]. In 2003 and 2007, posing as an “Associate Professor in Molecular Biology”, he came to China to promote his hangover medicine [b3], but unfortunately failed. His greatest contribution to biology is that he found one of the risks of GM foods to human health is the possibility of “the recombination of transgenic DNA and human genomic DNA” [b4].

Dr. Ge is the inventor of the term “Fangology” (Studies on Fang Zhouzi) [b5], and therefore the founder of it. He is currently a dedicated Fangologist who has published several online Fangology books with more than a million words, most of which were published to support Mr. Xiao Chuanguo immediately after Xiao’s arrest.

3. Junlin Liao (Xunzheng)

Financial Analyst at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Department of Surgery [c1]. As a self-claimed “Assistant Professor of Medicine” [c2] “doing clinical-focused medical research” [c3], he has made many contributions to biology and medicine. For example, he declared that “the Central Dogma has long been overthrown and falsified [c3]”; he found that “currently the authorities in the U.S. adopt food therapy as the preferred treatment of hypertension [c2]”. He also has significant contributions to the studies of law and criminal investigation. For example, he determined that an open letter protesting an unjust sentence “violates the principle of judicial independence… is a criminal offense … even could be convicted of contempt of court [c4]”; he inferred that “Fang Zhouzi himself staged the show with the probability of 5% [c5]” after Fang being attacked.

Dr. Liao believes that “the bastards who conspired the violence are really fucking cowards; brave ones should stand up and come forward directly” [c6]. Shortly after Xiao was identified to be the coward behind the violent attacks, Dr. Liao stood up and came forward directly to “offer reward to attack Fang Zhouzi,” announcing that “I want to recruit people to attack you, doing it righteously: … I reward $30 for each of the cases of spilling on Fang’s head with feces filled in a 300 ml or more container”[c7]. After the local police being called, Dr. Liao “no longer offers reward to attack Fang Zhouzi”, and cursed that “those who conspired violent actions should go to hell”[c8].

4. Shi Liu

Information technology specialist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [d1], self-claimed “super-class life scientist” and self-appointed “EPA environmental expert” [d2]. He is a long-term frequent contributor to top journals such as Cell, Nature and Science. After his huge amount of submissions misfortunately being rejected, he has become the sole author of a fleet of “scientific journals” [d3], of which he is also the publisher and the editor-in-chief [d4].

Shortly after Mr. Xiao’s arrest, Dr. Liu announced to “publicly surrender myself to Beijing police for my collusion and instigation with Chuanguo Xiao to teach Fang Zhouzi a lesson”, claiming himself as “the commander in chief of world’s army destroying Fang”, and “the highest level mastermind behind the case of teasing (not attacking) Fang” [d5].

5. Christopher Gan (Yuanpaigu)

Self-claimed “indepdent scholar” who “has to work everyday to pay the bills” [e1]. He also claimed that he “teaches at a Southern California law school” [e1], whose contribution in legal research is that he found that there do exist laws in the United States that “prohibit the public to express their political views in the Capitol” [e2]. Mr. Gan is also an amateur detective who, according to Yiming, “has seized a large amount of criminal evidence against Fang Zhouzi” [e3].

Shortly after Mr. Xiao’s arrest, Mr. Gan impersonated himself as Fang Zhouzi to post numerous abusive comments to curse Fang at Science’s website [e4], to express his hatred towards Fang. He also revealed in his comments that “that open letter signed by those 34 international medical doctors was written by Dr. Xaio’s wife”.

References

[a1] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14501733
[a2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15879861
[a3] http://im1.biz/000/Xiao_Support_Letter_Int.pdf
[a4] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/10/doctor-sentenced-in-beijing-for.html
[a5] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7318/full/467884a.html
[a6] http://www.researchgrantdatabase.com/g/5R01DK053063-05/SKIN-CNS-BLADDER-REFLEX-ARC-FOR-MICTURITION-AFTER-SCI/
[a7] http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/107/uploads/1998xiao14sci.gif
[a8] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10458412
[a9] http://news.yahoo.com/patients-protest-chinese-doctors-risky-surgery.html
[a10] http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/20/uploads/cctv2xiao.jpg
[a11] http://www.gov.cn/xwfb/2010-11/09/content_1741636_2.htm
[a12] http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/107/uploads/xpletter.html#l4
[a13] http://xysblogs.org/xysergroup/archives/8025
[a14] http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/Modern+Medicine+Now/Bladder-function-not-achieved-with-nerve-re-routin/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/698878
[a15] http://www.icsoffice.org/Documents/Documents.aspx?DocumentID=897
[a16]  http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_6bc79f2f0100rum8.html
[a17] http://www.gov.cn/xwfb/2012-04/12/content_2111891.htm
[a18] http://china.caixin.com/2012-05-08/100388020.html

[b1] http://web.archive.org/web/20090311045739/http://www.biol.sc.edu/~newplant/PlantBiology/students.html
[b2] http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1039208
[b3] http://www.pjinfo.net/2007shujuku/panjinshujuku/detail1.asp?project=%C0%FB%D3%C3%C4%CD%B8%DF%CE%C2%D2%D2%B4%BC%D1%F5%BB%AF%C3%B8%BC%F5%C7%E1%BE%C6%BE%AB%B6%D4%C8%CB%CC%E5%B5%C4%B6%BE%BA%A6
[b4] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=309667&do=blog&id=296920
[b5] http://www.rainbowplan.org/bbs/topic.php?topic=127278

[c1] http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/surgery/administration.html
[c2] http://nf.nfdaily.cn/ndzk/content/2010-06/17/content_12920325_2.htm
[c3] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=469310
[c4] http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/blog/xunzheng.txt
[c5] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=357799
[c6] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=357433
[c7] http://www.xys.org/forum/db/7/141/194.html
[c8] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=366244

[d1] http://www.epa.gov/heasd/emrb/emrb.html
[d2] http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_502041670102dt06.html
[d3] http://im1.biz/TopRejection.htm
[d4] http://im1.biz/albums/userpics/10001/LB2007V7N4A7_StemCell4Regeneration.htm
[d5] http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_502041670100ld4a.html

[e1] http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/sohu/dinglin4.txt
[e2] http://www.tianya.cn/publicforum/content/no01/1/116727.shtml
[e3] http://www.rainbowplan.org/bbs/topic.php?topic=141610
[e4] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/09/urologist-arrested-for-attacks.html
( Note: click on “Shi-Min Fang” then “View details” to show Yuanpaigu’s abusive comments )

1. 肖传国

前医生、教授，已革职，“肖氏手术”的发明人。该手术据称能使脊髓损伤患者恢复“几乎正常的膀胱存储和协同排尿功能”[a1]，“能使脊柱裂儿童无失禁并恢复膀胱功能”[a2]。来自“国际学术界”的合作者们曾在支持肖的公开信中[a3]，高度赞扬其“科学和人道贡献”，当时他因策划针对科学打假斗士方舟子和记者方玄昌的暴力袭击而被捕[a4,a5]。

肖最伟大的人道贡献是，在原本用于狗实验的美国NIH资金支持下[a6,a7]，“从动物实验勇敢地跨入人体研究”[a3]到中国矿工身上。当时，距其在同行评议杂志上发表猫实验论文[a8]还有4年。肖的另一项人道贡献是，在其手术被卫生部宣布为“安全性、有效性的循证医学证据尚不足”[a11]，并被河南省卫生厅叫停[a10]之前，肖与其团队已经在数千中国患者身上广泛开展了其手术 [a9]。

肖的科学贡献之一是，距其医院实施首例手术尚不足8个月，他就创造性地发现“术后随访8个月以上60例，85％的患者大小便已恢复正常”。他最重要的科学贡献则是他勇敢地让全世界的医生验证其手术，尽管国外迄今为止的临床试验表明：“手术临床疗效与肖此前所报告的截然不同”[a13]；德国，“该手术在8名脊髓损伤患者中无一达到其最初基本目标”[a14]；美国，9名脊柱裂患者中的“大多数患者尿失禁仍成问题”[a15]。

肖先生是方学研究先驱。早在10年前他就举报过方舟子抄袭，但不幸因无据而被《科学》驳回[a16]。此后，他不遗余力地投入到对方舟子的口头批判、法律诉讼乃至肉体打击，后者导致其身陷囹圄、教授职位解除、医生资格吊销。出狱后，他除了在其博客上推销其手术、招徕病人、遥控诊断外，一直积极从事方学研究。肖先生在历次反方战役中的不懈努力，特别是其狱中经历，使其成为方学家们当之无愧的精神领袖。

2. 葛莘（亦明）

前南卡罗莱纳大学植物学技术员[b1]、中文基础课教师[b2]。他对医学的最大贡献是发明了一种“年销售额即可达1.5亿元”的解酒药[b3]。曾于2003年和2007年冒充“分子生物学副教授”到中国推销该解酒药[b3]。他对生物学的最大贡献则是发现了转基因食品对人类健康的可能危害之一是存在“转基因DNA与人类基因组DNA整合到一起”的可能性[b4]。

葛博士是术语“Fangology（方学）”的发明人[b5]，他也因此成为方学研究的奠基人。现为专职方学家，著有数部上百万字方学著作，大部分紧急发表于肖传国被捕之后，以作为对肖的支持。

3. 廖俊林（寻正）

美国爱荷华大学附属医院外科财务分析员[c1]。自称“医学院助理教授”[c2]、现在做“偏向临床”的“医学研究”[c3]。他对生物学和医学有众多贡献，例如，宣布了“中心法则早就破产证伪”[c3]；发现了“（美国的）权威机构都把食疗当作首选的高血压治疗方式”[c2]。他对法学和刑侦学也有重大贡献，例如，判定《海内外知识分子关于肖传国诉方舟子案的公开信》“违背了现代法制中的司法独立原则……已经是刑事犯罪……甚至以藐视法庭而判罪”[c4]；在方舟子被袭后，推断“方舟子自己策划这一场表演”的可能性为5%[c5]。

廖博士认为：“策划这场暴力的混蛋，他妈的真是孬种，有种的直接站出来”[c6]。肖传国被证实是那个孬种后，廖博士“直接站出来”，公开“悬赏袭击方舟子”，宣布“我要招人袭击你，做得理直气状：……用300毫升以上的容器，装入大粪，泼到方舟子头上，每袭击一次，我奖励30美元。[c7]”被报警后，廖博士“不再悬赏袭击方舟子”，并诅咒“策划相应暴力行为是要下地狱的”[c8]。

4. 刘实

美国国家环保局信息技术专业人员[d1]，自称“超一流生命科学家”，自任“美国国家环保局环保专家”[d2]。他是顶尖期刊《细胞》、《自然》、《科学》等的长期、频繁供稿人。大量投稿不幸被拒绝后，他成为自己的大批“科学期刊”的唯一作者[d3]，同时身兼这大批“科学期刊”的出版商及总编[d4]。

肖传国被捕后，刘博士曾“向北警公开自首勾结诱导肖传国教训方舟子”，自称“全球剿方大军的统帅，8-29戏方案（不是袭方案）的最高级别主谋”[d5]。

5. 甘任远（圆排骨）

自称“为了能够支付帐单不得不每天干活”的“独力学者”，自称“在南加州的法学院教法律”[e1]。他在法学研究方面的贡献是发现了美国的确有法律“禁止民众在国会表达自己的政见”[e2]。甘任远还身兼业余侦探。据亦明宣称，甘“掌握大量方舟子犯罪证据，所以方舟子六年来一直不敢披露他的真身”[e3]。

为了发泄对方舟子的仇恨，甘任远在肖传国被捕后伪装成方舟子到《科学》网站大量发帖辱骂方舟子。点击留言中的“Shi-Min Fang”，然后点击“View details”，可以看到“圆排骨”所发的大量谩骂文字[e4]。甘任远还在留言中透露，“那份34名国外医生签署的公开信是肖先生的妻子写的”。

Biographies of Famous Fangologists

[Disclaimer: If you find something ridiculous in the Biographies, it is what it is.]

1. Chuanguo Xiao

Former medical doctor and professor (dismissed), inventor of the “Xiao Procedure”, a surgical procedure that, according to Xiao’s claims, can restore “almost normal storage and synergic voiding” in patients with spinal cord injury [a1], and “can achieve continence and restore bladder function in children with spina bifida” [a2]. His “scientific and humanitarian contributions to the world” were highly commended by his collaborators from the “International Academic Community” in an open letter [a3] in support of Xiao after he was arrested for masterminding violent attacks on science fraud buster Fang Zhouzi and journalist Fang Xuanchang [a4,a5].

His most greatest humanitarian contribution is that, funded by an NIH grant initially awarded for dogs research [a6,a7], he “took the courageous step of moving from animal research to human studies” [a3] on Chinese miners, 4 years before his research paper on cats was published in a peer-reviewed journal [a8]. His another humanitarian contribution is that he and his team had massively practiced his procedure on thousands of Chinese patients [a9], before the procedure was banned by the local health department [a10] following the announcement from the Ministry of Health of China that “the safety and efficacy of the technique still lacks validation in the sense of evidence-based medicine” [a11].

One of his scientific contributions is that, in less than 8 months after his first surgery in his hospital, he creatively found that, “followed up for more than 8 months, 85% of the 60 patients have recovered normal bladder and bowel functions” [a12]. His most significant contribution is that he bravely brought his procedure to the validation by doctors all over the world, although the clinical trials out of China so far have showed that “the clinical benefit of the procedure is not at all similar to (Xiao’s) previous reports” [a13]; “the surgery failed to achieve its primary goal for any of the eight SCI patients” in Germany [a14]; “incontinence still problem in most” of 9 spina bifida patients in the U.S. [a15].

Mr. Xiao is a pioneer Fangologist. He was the first to report Fang Zhouzi’s plagiarism as early as 10 years ago, but unfortunately was dismissed by Science for groundless accusation [a16]. Since then, he has spared no effort in verbal criticism, legal actions, and finally physical strike on Fang, while the latter led to his imprisonment, the removal of his professorship, and the revocation of his medical licence. After getting out of jail, he is still actively engaged in the studies of Fangology, besides promoting his procedure, recruiting patients and remote diagnosis on his blog. Mr. Xiao’s tireless efforts in each of anti-Fang campaigns, especially his experience behind bars, have made him the well-deserved spiritual leader of Fangologists.

2. Xin Ge (Yiming)

Former technician in Plant Biology [b1] and part-time teacher in Elementary Chinese Mandarin [b2] at the University of South Carolina. His greatest contribution to medicine is the invention of a hangover medicine, with expected annual sales of 20 million dollars [b3]. In 2003 and 2007, posing as an “Associate Professor in Molecular Biology”, he came to China to promote his hangover medicine [b3]. His greatest contribution to biology is that he found one of the risks of GM foods to human health is the possibility of “the recombination of transgenic DNA and human genomic DNA” [b4].

Dr. Ge is the inventor of the term “Fangology” (Studies on Fang Zhouzi) [b5], and therefore the founder of it. He is currently a dedicated Fangologist who has published several online Fangology books with more than a million words, most of which were published to support Mr. Xiao Chuanguo immediately after Xiao’s arrest.

3. Junlin Liao (Xunzheng)

Financial Analyst at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Department of Surgery [c1]. As a self-claimed “Assistant Professor of Medicine” [c2] “doing clinical-focused medical research” [c3], he has made many contributions to biology and medicine. For example, he declared that “the Central Dogma has long been overthrown and falsified [c3]”; he found that “currently the authorities in the U.S. adopt food therapy as the preferred treatment of hypertension [c2]”. He also has significant contributions to the studies of law and criminal investigation. For example, he determined that an open letter protesting an unjust sentence “violates the principle of judicial independence… is a criminal offense … even could be convicted of contempt of court [c4]”; he inferred that “Fang Zhouzi himself staged the show with the probability of 5% [c5]” after Fang being attacked.

Dr. Liao believes that “the bastards who conspired the violence are really fucking cowards; brave ones should stand up and come forward directly” [c6]. Shortly after Xiao was identified to be the coward behind the violent attacks, Dr. Liao stood up and came forward directly to “offer reward to attack Fang Zhouzi,” announcing that “I want to recruit people to attack you, doing it righteously: … I reward $30 for each of the cases of spilling on Fang’s head with feces filled in a 300 ml or more container”[c7]. After the local police being called, Dr. Liao “no longer offers reward to attack Fang Zhouzi”, and cursed that “those who conspired violent actions should go to hell”[c8].

4. Shi Liu

Information technology specialist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [d1], self-claimed “super-class life scientist” and self-appointed “EPA environmental expert” [d2]. He is a long-term frequent contributor to top journals such as Cell, Nature and Science. After his huge amount of submissions misfortunately being rejected, he has become the sole author of a fleet of “scientific journals” [d3], of which he is also the publisher and the editor-in-chief [d4].

Shortly after Mr. Xiao’s arrest, Dr. Liu announced to “publicly surrender myself to Beijing police for my collusion and instigation with Chuanguo Xiao to teach Fang Zhouzi a lesson”, claiming himself as “the commander in chief of world’s army destroying Fang”, and “the highest level mastermind behind the case of teasing (not attacking) Fang” [d5].

5. Christopher Gan (Yuanpaigu)

Self-claimed “indepdent scholar” who “has to work everyday to pay the bills” [e1]. He also claimed that he “teaches at a Southern California law school” [e1], whose contribution in legal research is that he found that there do exist laws in the United States that “prohibit the public to express their political views in the Capitol” [e2]. Mr. Gan is also an amateur detective who, according to Yiming, “has seized a large amount of criminal evidence against Fang Zhouzi” [e3].

Shortly after Mr. Xiao’s arrest, Mr. Gan impersonated himself as Fang Zhouzi to post numerous abusive comments to curse Fang at Science’s website [e4], to express his hatred towards Fang. He also revealed in his comments that “that open letter signed by those 34 international medical doctors was written by Dr. Xaio’s wife”.

References

[a1] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14501733
[a2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15879861
[a3] http://im1.biz/000/Xiao_Support_Letter_Int.pdf
[a4] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/10/doctor-sentenced-in-beijing-for.html
[a5] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7318/full/467884a.html
[a6] http://www.researchgrantdatabase.com/g/5R01DK053063-05/SKIN-CNS-BLADDER-REFLEX-ARC-FOR-MICTURITION-AFTER-SCI/
[a7] http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/107/uploads/1998xiao14sci.gif
[a8] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10458412
[a9] http://news.yahoo.com/patients-protest-chinese-doctors-risky-surgery.html
[a10] http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/20/uploads/cctv2xiao.jpg
[a11] http://www.china.com.cn/zhibo/2010-11/09/content_21298706.htm
[a12] http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/107/uploads/xpletter.html#l4
[a13] http://xysblogs.org/xysergroup/archives/8025
[a14] http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/Modern+Medicine+Now/Bladder-function-not-achieved-with-nerve-re-routin/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/698878
[a15] http://www.icsoffice.org/Documents/Documents.aspx?DocumentID=897
[a16] http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_6bc79f2f0100rum8.html

[b1] http://web.archive.org/web/20090311045739/http://www.biol.sc.edu/~newplant/PlantBiology/students.html
[b2] http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1039208
[b3] http://www.pjinfo.net/2007shujuku/panjinshujuku/detail1.asp?project=%C0%FB%D3%C3%C4%CD%B8%DF%CE%C2%D2%D2%B4%BC%D1%F5%BB%AF%C3%B8%BC%F5%C7%E1%BE%C6%BE%AB%B6%D4%C8%CB%CC%E5%B5%C4%B6%BE%BA%A6
[b4] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=309667&do=blog&id=296920
[b5] http://www.rainbowplan.org/bbs/topic.php?topic=127278

[c1] http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/surgery/administration.html
[c2] http://nf.nfdaily.cn/ndzk/content/2010-06/17/content_12920325_2.htm
[c3] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=469310
[c4] http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/blog/xunzheng.txt
[c5] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=357799
[c6] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=357433
[c7] http://www.xys.org/forum/db/7/141/194.html
[c8] http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=460310&do=blog&id=366244

[d1] http://www.epa.gov/heasd/emrb/emrb.html
[d2] http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_502041670102dt06.html
[d3] http://im1.biz/TopRejection.htm
[d4] http://im1.biz/albums/userpics/10001/LB2007V7N4A7_StemCell4Regeneration.htm
[d5] http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_502041670100ld4a.html

[e1] http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/sohu/dinglin4.txt
[e2] http://www.tianya.cn/publicforum/content/no01/1/116727.shtml
[e3] http://www.rainbowplan.org/bbs/topic.php?topic=141610
[e4] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/09/urologist-arrested-for-attacks.html
( Note: click on “Shi-Min Fang” then “View details” to show Yuanpaigu’s abusive comments )

《法治周末》在其诽谤文章中引述亦明收到的密歇根州立大学（MSU）学术诚信负责人的初审报告，如下：
“抄袭的指控成立必须符合两个标准，第一个是定义标准，第二个是证据标准。关于定义标准，如果某人将他人以前发表过的文章融入自己的文章之中，但却没有做出说明，则这种行为构成学术不端行为。本项指控达到了这个标准。”

亦明和曹明华曾先后断章取义公布过MSU“初审报告”的片段。将其公布过的内容合在一起是：
The DEFINITION of Misconduct provided in Section I. of the Procedures states: Misconduct means Fabrication, Falsification, Plagiarism, or any other practice …
There are two criteria that must be met in order for the RIO to refer an Allegation to an Inquiry. The first criterion is definitional; the second is evidentiary. Regarding the definitional criterion, if an individual writes an assay and includes, without attribution, significant sections of an article published previously by someone else, this could constitute Misconduct. The first criterion has been met.

正确翻译是：
《（学术不端行为）处理步骤》第一节“学术不端行为的定义”指出：学术不端行为是指伪造、篡改、抄袭以及其他行为……
学术诚信办公室（RIO）要将某指控提交进行调查必须符合两个标准，第一个是定义标准，第二个是证据标准。关于定义标准，如果某人将他人以前发表过的文章的重要部分融入自己的文章，但却没有做出说明，则这种行为构成学术不端行为。第一个标准已达到。

两相对比可知，《法治周末》把是否启动调查标准的标准（被指控的行为应当是抄袭这种构成学术不端的行为，而不是其他违反道德或违犯法律的行为），篡改成了判断抄袭的指控是否成立的标准。

类比一下，就是：《法治周末》将立案标准篡改成了判案标准、并且给出了判决。相当于：
1. RIO“初审报告”：甲指控乙偷盗。司法机关是否立案要有两个标准，一是甲所指控的乙的行为（偷盗）应当是构成违法犯罪的行为，二是甲提供了可信证据。
2. MSU致方舟子备忘录：甲“没有可信的证据能够支撑他们的指控”，而且乙不在现场（“你的网上文章并不是为了满足大学学业的要求”）。
3. 《法治周末》的恶意翻译：乙偷盗成立。但乙的偷盗行为不是发生在甲所说的那个时间。

总之，《法治周末》所谓“抄袭的指控成立必须符合两个标准……本项指控达到了这个标准”系恶意篡改，首、尾呼应的这各半句话是捏造的，以此造谣MSU已认定针对方舟子的“抄袭的指控成立”。事实上，即便按照方学家们断章取义公布过的原文，其中也根本不存在“抄袭的指控成立……”字样。

本人三年多前写就《举报：恐吓方舟子事件的幕后指使嫌疑人——肖传国》。当时肖匿名在网上发帖，公布所谓真相，但始终未以真实身份“澄清”。

肖传国在网上“马甲风起云涌”，网品恶劣。例如，针对他的一个马甲WWWW，有网友曾调侃说：
http://www.rainbowplan.org/bbs/topic.php?topic=103403&select=&forum=1
送交者: 唐吉诃德观光团 于 2009-11-18 01:21:37
老老年的时候俺问你WWWW是不是你的马甲，俺记得你当时坚定地说不是。那么俺恭喜你成功收复马甲的使用权——估计是学生秘书工作人员的马甲如今你用了。

为避免肖传国“坚定地说不是”，本人迟至今日才公布《举报》一文。

那么，肖为什么直到今天才以真身跳出来为恐吓方舟子事件“承担责任”呢？原因有二：

1. 彭剑律师敲山震虎，点明“肖氏反射弧”利益集团为怀疑对象之一。自称拥有神源医院30%股份的肖传国当然坐不住了。

2. 方玄昌、方舟子先后被袭击，据报道已经并案或两公安分局正在协调办案。两“方”共同的揭露对象是肖传国，两案合并，必然涉及当年的恐吓案，肖传国因此以诬陷方舟子报假案的方式主动出击。

肖传国这么干，难道不怕引火烧身？其实，他还是有一定的底气的：恐吓信之所以是恐吓信，就在于他肖传国肯定没在上面签字画押，即便方舟子将恐吓信公示，他肖传国仍可继续狡辩、继续污蔑。

但是的但是，肖传国公布的录像本身，已经确凿地证明了送信人的恐吓行为和恐吓话语。而且，肖传国当年对送信过程的描述，更是疑点重重、漏洞百出。

漏洞越来越多。例如，当年的“美国律师……香港的合作伙伴……北京的送达公司……侦探公司”的送信环节，现在已经简化为“自己的朋友上门送传票”了。

想自圆其说，难！

附：

成都商报报道：
http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2010-09-04/041518064724s.shtml
肖传国在接受采访时说，他的依据是2007年，自己的朋友上门送传票的时候，方舟子报案称自己被威胁。

肖传国当年的描述：
http://www.hust.org/forum/A0/p1/html/1527.html
虽远必诛! 中国侦探将美国法庭传票送达方舟子手中
散仙谷http://www.webjb.org/webjb/sanxian/
送交者: 搬运工 于 2007-02-04 17:52:14

昨天, 美国律师来电来E通知:中国侦探已于周四下午将美国法庭传票送达方是民手中.如此,诉讼将顺利地按部就班进行.

自 从在纽约联邦法院立案以来,已按程序递送传票等2次,均未果,因方在美并无职业、居所, 因此,我的律师通过他们在香港的合作伙伴，聘请北京的送达公司给方是民送传票，可是，他那最近给武汉法院的国内居住地址（西城区佟麟阁路62号新华社大院 11号楼810室）是假的！后来，香港律师事务所在北京聘用侦探公司，居然盯到了方舟子的住处，直接将传票塞到了方的手中！

据说，方只把门开了一条缝，很惊讶有东西送到，并拒绝接受，但送达人往其手中一塞，侦探公司的人则在旁录像。。。哈哈，这可是典型的American Way，所谓`国际惯例`是也:-)))

30天不请律师回复，按原告所诉求缺席判决（Default Judgement)。Ditto, 100万美元可买多少Alura? 俺得算算先^&^

【按：肖传国在其科学网博客中公开宣称“我有所有 证据将方舟子2007年2月1日报的案立即破案”，并提供了“给方舟子的恐吓信和送信人【独家照片视频】”，包括“黑社会送“恐吓信”的当场录音录像”、 “恐吓信和送信人照片”，并主动提出“将和北京警方联系，提供所有方舟子“恐吓信案”相关人员姓名，住址，电话”。
为配合北京警方侦破当年的恐吓信案以及目前的袭击案，特公布本人写于2007年的以下文章。】

最近，方舟子两次被人跟踪恐吓、递送恐吓信。方舟子已经报警，且在阳光卫视节目中表示不能肯定恐吓事件与《科学成就健康》的出版“有没有直接的关系”；同时，有人指控方舟子伪造恐吓信、欺骗舆论。为此，本人特根据获得的有关信息，向方舟子和警方举报跟踪恐吓的幕后指使嫌疑人。

本人获得的信息如下：

2007年2月1日，方舟子新浪网访谈后被人跟踪至在北京的工作室递送恐吓信。2007年2月4日下午2点30分，方舟子参加新书首发式，期间第二次收到恐吓信。当日下午约5点（根据论坛时间调整为北京时间），有笔名“搬运工”者以“虽远必诛!”为题在散仙谷论坛称“昨 天, 美国律师来电来E通知:中国侦探已于周四【注：2月1日】下午将美国法庭传票送达方是民手中”、“我的律师通过他们在香港的合作伙伴，聘请北京的送达公司 给方是民送传票”、“香港律师事务所在北京聘用侦探公司，居然盯到了方舟子的住处，直接将传票塞到了方的手中！”、“侦探公司的人则在旁录像”。次日凌晨 约1点，又在红墙论坛称“10分钟前收到的消息:在方是民签字售书现场也上演了:-))) 侦探公司尽责尽力啊:-) ”。后在散仙谷论坛补充说：“娃哈哈,恐吓? 太好了,上录象,上照片!这恐怖份子2.4又现身!他居然到王府井新华书店方舟子签名售书现场再次塞给他一封`恐吓信`~还把那恐吓信和方舟子一起拍照留念:-)))))))))))))) ……这TMD报伪警,做伪证犯的可是刑事罪”，并说：“那些1恐怖份子\’居然在他向记者们宣布恐吓信后,再次把那`恐吓信\”当众又送给他,还拍了3张方舟子和恐吓信在一起的特写照片!”

4月20日凌晨，“搬运工”发布肖传国诉方舟子案开庭通知，称“肖传国教授和律师将回答任何媒体问题.并分发方舟子捏造恐吓信的相关录像、照片、和美国法院的传票”。当日夜，北京大学人才研究中心“特座教授”、八卦骗子陈宽以“庄严无忧”笔名称“我旁听了北京一中院‘肖vs方’庭审……中午吃饭，老肖、秘书、律师和我，共5人，吃了快餐。律师买单”。次日中午，陈宽称其 “4月20日……获得老肖亲自散发的一份光盘录像”、“方舟子在2月初四处宣扬的所谓有人递交‘恐吓信’的事实真相，原来是北京商务调查公司人员（民间侦 探）受老肖律师委托，向被告方舟子（本名方是民）送达法律起诉文书”，并在其个人网站发布该录像。随后，该录像被linwen778上载到Youtube，并以“方舟子遭遇‘恐吓信’真相”为题散布于各论坛，包括北京大学科学传播中心和原丁祖诒博客。

经本人核查，“搬运工”系华中科技大学同济医学院肖传国教授。肖以该笔名长期活跃在散仙谷等论坛，提供过众多只有肖才有可能知道的信息，包括家庭工作等情况、诉方舟子案的细节等，曾率先公布肖传国在北京西城区法院诉方舟子的民事诉状，曾公布肖传国与美国《科学》杂志记者的私人电子邮件 内容，曾首发《肖传国致全国媒体,学术界同仁和方舟子的公开信》。

根据以上信息及本人掌握的其他情况，本人确信，跟踪恐吓方舟子的幕后指使者即为肖传国教授。理由如下：

1. 肖传国有犯罪前科，并有数次威胁他人的历史。

根据美国法庭记录，肖传国在美期间曾因犯罪入狱。肖曾因某位郑女士的笔名与Yush曾用过的ID相同而公开威胁“无论如何报复也不为过”、“决不放过并一定用最大力度惩罚任何侮辱者”、“要采取行动不会在网上，一旦动起来，你是聪明人，应该明白结果”。后又公开悬赏收集Yush的信息：“大家伙谁有,谁能搞到Yush的准确信息,请注意保留,收集.待正事办完,老肖会悬赏一个FELLOWSHIP征购.不会饶了那那狗日的癞蛤蚂。”并称“这也算得上老肖有仇必报的佐证吧”。

2. 肖传国有威胁方舟子的动机并已经多次实施威胁。

自方舟子揭露作为院士候选人的肖传国弄虚作假后，肖怀恨在心，多次针对方舟子以真名或笔名扬言“我要亲自报仇雪恨”、“此仇不报，誓不为人”、“有恩必报，有仇必报”、“此仇不可不报”、“报仇雪恨除恶棍,……此仇必报,by whatever means.”【译：“采取无论什么手段”】、“深恶痛绝，发誓报仇”。

3. 肖传国送达所谓美国传票的方式、过程可疑。

传票本可以采用的省时省力的邮寄方式送达。例如，与送达所谓美国传票同期的2月上旬，肖传国诉方舟子、人民网案的传票即以邮寄方式寄出，方舟子于2月8日收到。而“美国传票”却采用了所谓由美国律师通过在香港的事务所、再通过侦探公司、送达公司折腾一圈的方式。

送传票本是光明正大的事，送信人显然也有在公共场合送达给方舟子的机会，例如方舟子从新浪网访谈出来后、进入公寓电梯前等。而实际过程却是先花时间跟踪、 跟进电梯、获知方舟子房间号、过一个小时再上门、选择在没有他人在场的情况下偷偷摸摸“送达”。此外，既然已经送达过一次，理应没必要在新书首发式再次送 达，正如肖传国自己所言：“其实照说只要送达一次就够了”。而且，为了送两次传票，原告需要事先在美国法院签署两套传票原件。

4. 送信人送达所谓美国传票的细节可疑。

如果真要送达传票、并用录像在美国法庭上证明已将法庭文书送达当事人，肖传国或其美国律师（通过他们在香港的合作伙伴）理应向其聘用的送信人交代清楚、作为侦探公司和送达公司雇员的送信人自己也理应明白该怎么做：先确认方舟子身份、再说明自己的身份（即如肖传国所言“居 然居然敢自报大名”）、然后交代自己的目的是送传票。而实际上，所谓“方舟子遭遇‘恐吓信’真相”的录像，录像设备很差，拍摄技巧极不专业。录像中看到的 是鬼鬼祟祟的模糊身影，听到的是期期艾艾的谎言和严声厉气的威胁。欺骗方舟子开门后扔下一封信、说了一句“你自己做的事情自己清楚”，然后转身就跑掉。这 不是送恐吓信是什么？对此，陈宽一语道破天机：“肘子以为是打假资料，没想到是恐吓信，才接受。”可以断定，公布出来的那段所谓传票送达录像，原本是送信人用来从幕后指使者那里领取赏金的“证据”。

方舟子公布恐吓信事件时，送信的当事人也在现场。他理应当着众多记者读者的面立即站出来戳穿方舟子的“谎言”、同时众目睽睽下送达传票并拍照，即应当如肖传国所言：“在他向记者们宣布恐吓信后,再次把那`恐吓信\”当众又送给他”，以及其支持者所言：“应该大声宣布：方是民……我们必须在这里把传票递到你的手上。”而据方舟子在阳光卫视节目中透露，实际情况却是送信人将信封塞给方舟子、说了一句“回家好好去看去”、然后“赶快转身就跑掉了”，以至于陈宽 后来抱怨：“我觉得，在王府井新华书店，当时侦探应该说明真实情况，再拍照。”

5. 肖传国公布所谓美国传票已送达的时机可疑。

方舟子收到恐吓信后立即报警、随后向媒体通报、公布恐吓者照片。肖传国恰巧在方舟子向媒体通报恐吓事件、并第二次收到恐吓信后的数小时公布美国传票已于数日前送达的消息。肖传国对未及时公布消息有一套说辞：“周四送达后,美国律师隔了一天才通知老肖.本该立即宣布,可是那两天忙得天昏地暗不说,恰恰手提电脑挡机,英文的window startup CD 又在美国,只好送外面加装正版中文,又重装无线上网软件,所以星期天才拿回来,发了下面的消息: 虽远必诛!……”。

新书首发式上，送信人就在现场，可以立即（而不必等到次日凌晨1点之前10分钟）告知肖传国有关方舟子向媒体通报恐吓事件的消息。可以推断，接获消息后， 肖传国为避免引火烧身被警方追查到，遂咬定送的是传票，同时反诬方舟子伪造恐吓信、假报警，并虚构了“我的律师……香港的合作伙伴……北京的送达公司…… 侦探公司”的送信环节，其目的是为推卸最终法律责任留下后路。肖所述这一送信环节 （“我的律师通过他们在香港的合作伙伴，聘请北京的送达公司给方是民送传票”），与当初肖以jdsbj为笔名、借其学生的口吻威胁郑女士时所说的“我把老板的E让律师事务所的秘书转发给郑”【注：E指电子邮件】采用的是同一伎俩。

6. 肖传国公布录像的方式可疑。

肖传国很早就声称要公布录像，“与各位大仙共享,No, 于警方共享……请大家从门缝里欣赏反恐大师方舟子^&^ ”，声称“有没干记者的想要? 只给一家作独家新闻, 先来先得”，最后却招至其支持者的怀疑：“肖和快递公司不出来说明，可能是有见不得人的地方”。北京中院开庭前夕又发布“开庭后,肖传国教授将回答记者任何问题,并将用录象和照片和揭露方舟子欺骗媒体”，最终却由“中午吃饭……吃了快餐”、“获得老肖亲自散发的一份光盘录像”的八卦骗子陈宽及另一匿名者linwen778公布录像。肖传国不以真实身份出面“澄清”，反而拐弯抹角由他人公布录像，正是其心虚的表现，也是其逃避责任的手段。

综上所述，本人强烈怀疑肖传国教授是跟踪恐吓方舟子事件的幕后指使者，并向方舟子和警方举报。同时，鉴于肖传国等人指控方舟子伪造恐吓信、报假警、欺骗舆论，本人恳请警方追查恐吓录像的来龙去脉、查明恐吓事件的事实真相，惩罚肇事者、保护受害人，并还受害人清白。

恐吓信事件对话实录

以下是肖传国的“律师通过他们在香港的合作伙伴，聘请北京的送达公司给方是民送传票”的对话实录。

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfcYiwke4_0
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/K7XZgeTMdLw/

（低语）不碍事吧?……
（敲门声）
喂，你好，我送个快件给你。……一封信……资料。
方：谁送的？
啊？谁送的？呃……那个……见到一个朋友给的……
方：嗯？
一个朋友给我送……送……送来的。
方：谁？
谁呀……他认识你也不知道……
方：谁呀？是谁？
那……嗯……谁呀……是我的朋友，他给你一份资料你要的。
方：我没有找朋友要过资料。是谁？
那个……是这样的……他们送到我的宿舍了，是那个(？？)的人呢，这是快件公司给送来的。
方：我没有要过资料。
你看看那个做事情的给你看的。
方：我没有要过资料。谁送的也不知道。
嘿怎么能不知道，快件公司给我的。他的意思送……叫我送到这边来，你今天晚上请你看一看。
方：你是谁啊？
我，我是谁啊？我姓（？）。
方：我没有要资料，你有没有搞错？
不会搞错的。(？？)是你自己的，给你的。
（开门声）
唔，你看看。……你自己做的事自己清楚！给你吧！

八卦骗子陈宽事后描述：“肘子以为是打假资料，没想到是恐吓信，才接受。”

部分链接：

虽远必诛! 中国侦探将美国法庭传票送达方舟子手中 搬运工 (743字节) 02/04 17:52 (730718)
哈哈,10分钟前收到的消息:在方是民签字售书现场也上演了:-))) 老搬 (61字节) 02/05 02:19 (80918)
方是民签字售书现场,应该大声宣布：方是民，你给 诸葛光 (85字节) 02/05 03:08 (80934)
娃哈哈,恐吓? 太好了,上录象,上照片!这恐怖份子2.4又现身! 搬运工 (282字节) 02/05 19:24 (730970)
谁会把录像上网的举个手? 附赠王府井新华书店`恐吓照片N张. 搬运工 (197字节) 02/06 17:42 (731297)
自作孽,不可活.很多事都是天意. 搬运工 (711字节) 02/06 18:32 (731314)
WK,给方是民送传票的录像和王府井的恐吓信照片收到了:-) 搬运工 (236字节) 02/08 11:43 (731920)
经快递公司与警方核实:2月1号至今没有叫方是民或刘菊花的报警 搬运工 (175字节) 02/09 17:59 (732267)
肖和快递公司不出来说明，可能是有见不得人的地方 乾坤 (13字节) 03/01 04:38 (737699)
肖传国诉方舟子毁誉和抄袭科学杂志案北京中级法院开庭通知 搬运工 (256字节) 03/30 07:00 (745033)
开庭通告:时间,法庭,证人,\”恐吓信\”录像和照片和旁听须知 搬运工 (281字节) 04/20 02:19 (751716)
我旁听了北京一中院“肖vs方”庭审 庄严无忧 (625字节) 04/20 23:09 (752037)
最新独家下载“方舟子被恐吓”录像 庄严无忧 (639字节) 04/21 12:48 (752451)

本文链接：
http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/20/uploads//blackmail.htm
肖传国针对方舟子复仇言论见：
http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/20/uploads//revenge.htm
八卦骗子陈宽其人其事，见：
http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/20/uploads//chenkuan.htm

李淼在一篇归类为“闲聊、理论物理”的博客文章中声称狭义相对论和广义相对论没有什么实际应用价值，实在令人诧异。李淼所在的中国科学院理论物理所的老所长周光召曾指出，爱因斯坦最伟大的成果—广义相对论在实际生产和生活中的一个重要应用就是现在已经运行的GPS等卫星导航系统，这种应用研究应该引起我国科技工作者的重视。显然，老所长的指示没有传达到李淼，还需要身为生物化学博士的方舟子讲解这项著名的相对论应用，够滑稽吧？这不，俺这个外行也忍不住google一番，查一查相对论到底有什么实际应用价值。

狭义相对论的直接推论是质能公式。中国科学界最权威的人物论述过其重大意义。中国科学院院长路甬祥指出：“爱因斯坦……根据狭义相对论提出了质量与能量可互换的思想，这应该是原子能释放的理论基础。”理论物理所老所长、“两弹一星功勋奖章”获得者周光召则指出：“相对论还确定了物质和能量的等价，为原子能的开发利用奠定了理论的基础”，“我们之所以现在有原子能电站，有原子弹、氢弹的爆炸，就来源于爱因斯坦在1905年所发现的物质和能量是等价的结论。”

核物理、粒子物理最重要的实验装置是粒子加速器。要使高速粒子能正确加速、传输、聚焦、对撞，必须根据狭义相对论对粒子质量、速度、轨迹进行校正。粒子加速器当然并非只应用于基础科学研究，而是具有广泛的“实际应用价值”，用“粒子加速器+应用”搜索一下便知，例如：“加速器的应用已远远超出原子核物理和粒子物理领域，在诸如材料科学、表面物理、分子生物学、光化学等其他科技领域都有着重要应用。在工、农、医各个领域中加速器广泛用于同位素生产、肿瘤诊断与治疗、射线消毒、无损探伤、高分子辐照聚合、材料辐照改性、离子注入、离子束微量分析以及空间辐射模拟、核爆炸模拟等方面。”

在涉及高速微观粒子的场合，必须考虑其相对论效应进行设计计算，粒子加速器就是一例。此外，还有众多利用高速电子束的应用实例，比如观察微观世界的电子显微镜、通讯方面的高功率微波电真空器件、医疗和军事方面具有应用价值的自由电子激光、乃至家用大屏幕显像管。

李淼自称“核物理……距离我不算太远”、“是研究弦论的，是粒子物理更深层次上的东西”。他似乎没有想到，相对论在离他“不算太远”的核物理和“层次”更浅的粒子物理方面就有具体的科学、技术、工程上的应用。建议理论物理所贯彻落实老所长的指示，在提倡“这种应用研究应该引起我国科技工作者的重视”的同时，也引起本所科研人员的重视，并加强对本所科研人员的科普教育，以免本所科研人员以“闲聊、理论物理”为名而信口开河。:)

俺开始跟着谭浩强大师的《C程序设计》第三版开始学习C语言了。学到现在，发现的最精彩的部分，是第3章第9节第4小节“赋值表达式”（第63、64页）。

谭大师在这一小节指出“常变量不能作左值，因为常变量不能被赋值”。张云楼同学满面疑惑举手提问：“有常量、有变量，什么叫常变量呢？”听说张同学跟谭大师学了10几年的C语言，从第一版学到第三版，眼看着本书发行量从300万长到1000万，怎么连这写得是最清楚的一句话都不明白呢？赶紧翻书，发现这也怪不得张同学：本书只讲了常量、变量，除本小节这句话外根本就没“常变量”这仨字；突然蹦出来个新名词新概念，同学们摸不着头脑啊。课外俺又考证了一番，本书第二版还没有“常变量”一说，但在2004年和2006年谭大师分别出了一本《C++程序设计》和《C++面向对象程序设计》，其中有一节“用const定义常变量”。看来，这个“常变量”果然就是eng老师课外指导张同学时说的constant variable，即用const标识符所标识的、初始化后程序不能改变其值的变量。好像K&R（The C Programming Language）第二版至少在10年前（也有可能在20余年前第二版初次发行的1988年，未能考证）就按ANSI C标准全面讲述了这个const标识符；相比之下，好像谭大师有点儿与时俱进得太慢了吧？稍微“俱进”了一下，又有点儿太急躁太粗糙了吧？

更精彩的还是本小节那些赋值表达式的例子，那简直是在英勇地挑战脆弱的C编译器的容忍极限。除了据“注意版本”同学说“有些版本的编译器确实是支持”、但不幸不被本书推荐上机用的Turbo C 2.0、Turbo C++ 3.0、Visual C++中的C编译器支持、eng老师怀疑只有“谭氏版”编译器才支持、挑战极限可能没有成功的表达式(a=3*5)=4*3外，最令人惊叹的是谭大师给出了求解步骤的这个表达式：a+=a-=a*a。多亏了谭大师的循循善诱，否则这个表达式非把俺搞“精分”了不可。

据谭大师书中说，类似的这些赋值表达式还是“C语言灵活性的一种表现。在第6章中将进一步看到这种应用及其优越性”。可是，俺那个程序员邻居告诉俺，说是这种晦涩的表达式正是编程大忌；有一回他卖弄了一下，写了个类似这样的表达式，竟然还被人骂作变态。

原本简单明了的赋值表达式竟然可以复杂到这种程度，比“茴”字的四种写法都难。感谢谭大师，让俺终于明白了为什么很多同学都说C语言很难学，更让俺为学完了本小节而感到无比的骄傲。

张云楼同学说：

《C程序设计》例3.3说在TurboC上32767+1没有得到32768，得到的是-32768。然后作者说“将变量b改成long型就可以得到预期结果32768了”，敢问谭教授上机试过没有，我试过了，不行。

“注意版本”同学驳斥说：

例1作者试过了TC几个版本，编译模式估计是缺省的，改过吗？感觉现在用TC很少了吧，近20年前流行的。我相信教材作者至少在某个版本上试验过，很可能后来版本更新了引起问题。版本兼容性问题在计算机界普遍存在。

谭大师在《C程序设计》（2005年第三版第44页）说：

在Turbo C和Turbo C++中，一个int型的变量的最大允许值为32767，如果再加1，会出现什么情况？
例3.3 整型数据的溢出
#include <stdio.h>
main()
{
  int a,b;
  a=32767;
  b=a+1;
  printf(”%d, %d\n”, a, b);
}
运行结果为：
32767, -32768
……将变量b改成long型就可得到预期结果32768。

经Turbo C 2.01实验（其他16位编译系统应有同样结果），证明谭大师所说的“将变量b改成long型就可得到预期结果32768”错误。

将变量b改成long型，输出仍为-32768。原因是printf函数按%d两字节int型整数格式，取传递过来的b的4字节中的低两字节（二进制1000000000000000，对应-32768）输出。

再将printf中与b对应的格式符%d改为%ld，输出仍为-32768。原因是b=a+1一句中，a+1运算按编译器默认的两字节整数进行，结果为二进制1000000000000000（对应-32768）；赋值给b时，b的高两字节将进行符号位扩展（而非填0），b的值为二进制11111111111111111000000000000000（对应4字节long型整数-32768）。因此，还必须将a+1中的a或1强制转换或设置为long型，使a+1运算按4字节整数进行，才能得到预期结果32768。

以下是修改后的程序（三处修改缺一不可）：
#include <stdio.h>
main()
{
  int a;
  long b;
  a=32767;
  b=(long)a+1; /* or b=a+1L */
  printf(”%d, %ld\n”, a, b);
}

谭大师所谓“将变量b改成long型就可得到预期结果32768”不可能在任何一个16位C编译系统上成功（而在32位系统上，根本不会出现例3.3的溢出问题），因此，谭大师显然如张云楼同学所猜测没有上机试过；也不存在“注意版本”同学所谓的“版本更新了引起问题”。

注：可在http://books.google.com中搜索“整型数据的溢出”，即可一瞻谭大师大作风采（封面上赫然印着“发行700万册记录”）。

补记：
在网上找了个谭浩强著《C程序设计》第二版扫描版（未知出版年份版次），错误与google books上的第三版（2005年清华大学出版社）相同。又据无敌法王提供的第二版（2004年9月第53次印刷），相应表述已改正为：“将变量a和b改成long型，并按%ld格式输出，就可得到预期的结果32768”。据此推测，此书第三版是在错误的第二版老版本上“升级”的，在这方面，确如“注意版本”同学所说，“版本更新了引起问题”。

补记2：
据无敌法王亲自前往新华书店核实，本书第三版第22次印刷中错误已纠正为：
“将变量b改成long型（同时将a+1改成a+1L,并按%ld格式输出），就可得到预期结果32768。”