<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="lyceum/1.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>《淘金术》的评论</title>
	<link>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935</link>
	<description>随意聊</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>由：Stephen.Li</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-28035</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-28035</guid>
					<description>牛啊，几年来的历史就这样阐述清楚。

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>牛啊，几年来的历史就这样阐述清楚。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：james_hussein_bond</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-27939</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-27939</guid>
					<description>呵呵。为了你索隐方便，把那篇Nature文章链上：
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v381/n6585/abs/381767a0.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>呵呵。为了你索隐方便，把那篇Nature文章链上：<br />
<a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v381/n6585/abs/381767a0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v381/n6585/abs/381767a0.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：Amsel</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-27936</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-27936</guid>
					<description>OK 这里有解释

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes#Black.E2.80.93Scholes_formula</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK 这里有解释</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes#Black.E2.80.93Scholes_formula" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes#Black.E2.80.93Scholes_formula</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：Amsel</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-27933</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 05:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/jhb/archives/5935#comment-27933</guid>
					<description>你叙述的例子说采用正态分布微分方程才有解析解，是真是假？以俺的一点点经历，正态分布加微分方程不可能化简微分积分问题。俺用的是均匀分布才把微分积分问题化成常微分方程。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你叙述的例子说采用正态分布微分方程才有解析解，是真是假？以俺的一点点经历，正态分布加微分方程不可能化简微分积分问题。俺用的是均匀分布才把微分积分问题化成常微分方程。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
