<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="lyceum/1.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>《奶是妈妈的好》的评论</title>
	<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795</link>
	<description>心中有道义 脑中有科学</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>由：affordable appliance repair charleston</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-587626</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-587626</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;affordable appliance repair charleston...&lt;/strong&gt;

æ¹èå­çBlog » å¥¶æ¯å¦å¦çå¥½...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>affordable appliance repair charleston&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>æ¹èå­çBlog » å¥¶æ¯å¦å¦çå¥½&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：Na</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10963</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10963</guid>
					<description>faint，补充一句，是全职工作的妈妈。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>faint，补充一句，是全职工作的妈妈。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：Na</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10978</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10978</guid>
					<description>我的孩子快1岁11个月了。我一直都是breast feed。自己也很希望能够坚持到两岁。对于一个全职妈妈来说，这其实挺不容易的。
看了方舟子先生的文章，很有感触。
我自己，强烈反对在婴儿初生后不时喂哺奶粉。我的儿子住了10天儿科，我们是从第三天开始送母乳进去的。之前医院对他的饮食记录（也许就是喂的配方奶粉），是1毫升都要呕吐。我们送母乳之后，儿子的食量开始成倍增加。很多人说，给孩子吃母乳，孩子就哭，睡不好觉。个人觉得，这是大人贪图自己多休息一下吧。母乳就是要勤喂才有，才能持续得久。
希望母乳喂养的孩子越来越多吧。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我的孩子快1岁11个月了。我一直都是breast feed。自己也很希望能够坚持到两岁。对于一个全职妈妈来说，这其实挺不容易的。<br />
看了方舟子先生的文章，很有感触。<br />
我自己，强烈反对在婴儿初生后不时喂哺奶粉。我的儿子住了10天儿科，我们是从第三天开始送母乳进去的。之前医院对他的饮食记录（也许就是喂的配方奶粉），是1毫升都要呕吐。我们送母乳之后，儿子的食量开始成倍增加。很多人说，给孩子吃母乳，孩子就哭，睡不好觉。个人觉得，这是大人贪图自己多休息一下吧。母乳就是要勤喂才有，才能持续得久。<br />
希望母乳喂养的孩子越来越多吧。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：方舟子</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10965</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10965</guid>
					<description>comebackcat：一、所谓纯母乳，就是刚生下就不吃奶粉。奶水一开始少，没有关系，多吸就会很快多起来。实际上一开始就吃奶粉会干扰哺乳。二、婴儿皮肤容易被晒伤，不提倡让二岁以下婴儿被阳光直射。靠阳光照射很难确定是否足够，特别是冬天时。故美国儿科学会建议从一、两个月起都要补充足够的维生素D。配方奶粉和维生素D制剂都是有效的。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comebackcat：一、所谓纯母乳，就是刚生下就不吃奶粉。奶水一开始少，没有关系，多吸就会很快多起来。实际上一开始就吃奶粉会干扰哺乳。二、婴儿皮肤容易被晒伤，不提倡让二岁以下婴儿被阳光直射。靠阳光照射很难确定是否足够，特别是冬天时。故美国儿科学会建议从一、两个月起都要补充足够的维生素D。配方奶粉和维生素D制剂都是有效的。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：comebackcat</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10976</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10976</guid>
					<description>写错了，赶紧更正。我是方舟子先生的粉丝。方舟子先生是我的偶像！！！！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>写错了，赶紧更正。我是方舟子先生的粉丝。方舟子先生是我的偶像！！！！
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：comebackcat</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10977</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10977</guid>
					<description>方舟子先生是我的粉丝，我一直对您的文章100%消化吸收，但是今天看了这篇文章我却有不同意见了。因为我正好刚生完孩子一年而且一直在母乳喂养。第一，北京的各大医院还是积极倡导母乳喂养的，刚生完孩子的时候由于奶没有下来是需要吃配方奶粉的，可能10毫升至50毫升每天，直到奶水完全够。第二，对需要补充维生素D表示不同意见。只要婴儿每天保证一定的晒阳光是不需要补充的。而目前流行吃配方奶、补钙补维生素d，并不一定有效。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>方舟子先生是我的粉丝，我一直对您的文章100%消化吸收，但是今天看了这篇文章我却有不同意见了。因为我正好刚生完孩子一年而且一直在母乳喂养。第一，北京的各大医院还是积极倡导母乳喂养的，刚生完孩子的时候由于奶没有下来是需要吃配方奶粉的，可能10毫升至50毫升每天，直到奶水完全够。第二，对需要补充维生素D表示不同意见。只要婴儿每天保证一定的晒阳光是不需要补充的。而目前流行吃配方奶、补钙补维生素d，并不一定有效。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：Taken</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10964</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10964</guid>
					<description>正在找这个，找个奶妈</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>正在找这个，找个奶妈
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：秋瑟</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10966</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10966</guid>
					<description>现在北京5城市节目正在播出的掌纹的秘密，有科学依据吗？我想请教您一下</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>现在北京5城市节目正在播出的掌纹的秘密，有科学依据吗？我想请教您一下
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：Carl</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10975</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 06:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10975</guid>
					<description>Google之后，才知道母乳喂养叫“breast feed”。以此搜索Cochrane Library，找到一篇研究摘要：“Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding”。该文通过分析全世界的22个对照研究（主要是observational studies），得出的结论支持的是方先生文中所说的WHO建议的“前6个月纯母乳喂养”。该文发于21 January 2002。摘要网址：http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD003517/frame.html

虽然缺少Large randomized trials，该文也算是目前的最佳证据（我能找到的）。

Authors' conclusions
We found no objective evidence of a 'weanling's dilemma'. Infants who are exclusively breastfed for six months experience less morbidity from gastrointestinal infection than those who are mixed breastfed as of three or four months, and no deficits have been demonstrated in growth among infants from either developing or developed countries who are exclusively breastfed for six months or longer. Moreover, the mothers of such infants have more prolonged lactational amenorrhea. Although infants should still be managed individually so that insufficient growth or other adverse outcomes are not ignored and appropriate interventions are provided, the available evidence demonstrates no apparent risks in recommending, as a general policy, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life in both developing and developed-country settings. Large randomized trials are recommended in both types of setting to rule out small effects on growth and to confirm the reported health benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for six months or beyond.

Plain language summary
Exclusive breastfeeding for six months (versus three to four months) reduces gastrointestinal infection, does not impair growth, and helps the mother lose weight

The results of two controlled trials and 18 other studies suggest that exclusive breastfeeding (no solids or liquids besides human milk, other than vitamins and medications) for six months has several advantages over exclusive breastfeeding for three to four months followed by mixed breastfeeding. These advantages include a lower risk of gastrointestinal infection, more rapid maternal weight loss after birth, and delayed return of menstrual periods. No reduced risks of other infections or of allergic diseases have been demonstrated. No adverse effects on growth have been documented with exclusive breastfeeding for six months, but a reduced level of iron has been observed in developing-country settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google之后，才知道母乳喂养叫“breast feed”。以此搜索Cochrane Library，找到一篇研究摘要：“Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding”。该文通过分析全世界的22个对照研究（主要是observational studies），得出的结论支持的是方先生文中所说的WHO建议的“前6个月纯母乳喂养”。该文发于21 January 2002。摘要网址：http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD003517/frame.html</p>
<p>虽然缺少Large randomized trials，该文也算是目前的最佳证据（我能找到的）。</p>
<p>Authors&#8217; conclusions<br />
We found no objective evidence of a &#8216;weanling&#8217;s dilemma&#8217;. Infants who are exclusively breastfed for six months experience less morbidity from gastrointestinal infection than those who are mixed breastfed as of three or four months, and no deficits have been demonstrated in growth among infants from either developing or developed countries who are exclusively breastfed for six months or longer. Moreover, the mothers of such infants have more prolonged lactational amenorrhea. Although infants should still be managed individually so that insufficient growth or other adverse outcomes are not ignored and appropriate interventions are provided, the available evidence demonstrates no apparent risks in recommending, as a general policy, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life in both developing and developed-country settings. Large randomized trials are recommended in both types of setting to rule out small effects on growth and to confirm the reported health benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for six months or beyond.</p>
<p>Plain language summary<br />
Exclusive breastfeeding for six months (versus three to four months) reduces gastrointestinal infection, does not impair growth, and helps the mother lose weight</p>
<p>The results of two controlled trials and 18 other studies suggest that exclusive breastfeeding (no solids or liquids besides human milk, other than vitamins and medications) for six months has several advantages over exclusive breastfeeding for three to four months followed by mixed breastfeeding. These advantages include a lower risk of gastrointestinal infection, more rapid maternal weight loss after birth, and delayed return of menstrual periods. No reduced risks of other infections or of allergic diseases have been demonstrated. No adverse effects on growth have been documented with exclusive breastfeeding for six months, but a reduced level of iron has been observed in developing-country settings.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：Carl</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10974</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1795#comment-10974</guid>
					<description>对于母乳喂养与配方奶粉喂养的优劣，不知道国外有没有人做过随机对照研究，甚至是Meta分析。如果有循证医学证据，我们对于母乳喂养究竟比配方奶粉好多少就会有一个更清晰、更准确的认识。可惜，我英文水平相当有限，连母乳的英文都不知道，不然我自己就去Pubmed检索一下</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>对于母乳喂养与配方奶粉喂养的优劣，不知道国外有没有人做过随机对照研究，甚至是Meta分析。如果有循证医学证据，我们对于母乳喂养究竟比配方奶粉好多少就会有一个更清晰、更准确的认识。可惜，我英文水平相当有限，连母乳的英文都不知道，不然我自己就去Pubmed检索一下
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
