<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="lyceum/1.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>《人为什么不长体毛？》的评论</title>
	<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346</link>
	<description>心中有道义 脑中有科学</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>由：sunbin</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-37892</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-37892</guid>
					<description>为什么腋下有毛?这也可用衣服说解释.因为衣服磨不到腋下
(当然这只是一种理论假设)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>为什么腋下有毛?这也可用衣服说解释.因为衣服磨不到腋下<br />
(当然这只是一种理论假设)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：sunbin</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-37891</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-37891</guid>
					<description>个人比较偏向衣服说理论.

至于没衣服的部落的问题,有可能是共同祖先曾经有衣服,后来因为天气改变(或迁徙)有舍弃了衣服而已.  冰河时期的非洲并不热.今天的非洲很多地方也不是都那么热,看了南非世界杯都穿大衣吗?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>个人比较偏向衣服说理论.</p>
<p>至于没衣服的部落的问题,有可能是共同祖先曾经有衣服,后来因为天气改变(或迁徙)有舍弃了衣服而已.  冰河时期的非洲并不热.今天的非洲很多地方也不是都那么热,看了南非世界杯都穿大衣吗?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：piaochen</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-333</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-333</guid>
					<description>During Mid- and late 1980, NIH accepted Chinese Medical Doctors who came from China to NIH to get their postdoctoral training that was not directly invloving patient care. There were very few young Chinese Medical Doctors who came to the US with a Doctoral Degree in Medicine at that time. One of the reasons is that the medical students who entered into medical school in 1977 could only have earned their Bechelor Degree of Medicine (BDM) in 1982, but could be a physician to practice medicine as soon as they graduated from schools. In the USA, they called those BDMs FMGs (Foreign Medical Graduates),who could take medical board examination and become ECFMG-certified to practice medicine in the US. As we know, those medical doctors with B.D.M. who had completed the master program in China during 1982-1989, could enter into NIH's postdocotral training programs at that time. To be fair about this, it was Dr. Zhan's intention to enter into the Fogarty postdoctoral training program, but it was the US government's choice to include him in the program for the training.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During Mid- and late 1980, NIH accepted Chinese Medical Doctors who came from China to NIH to get their postdoctoral training that was not directly invloving patient care. There were very few young Chinese Medical Doctors who came to the US with a Doctoral Degree in Medicine at that time. One of the reasons is that the medical students who entered into medical school in 1977 could only have earned their Bechelor Degree of Medicine (BDM) in 1982, but could be a physician to practice medicine as soon as they graduated from schools. In the USA, they called those BDMs FMGs (Foreign Medical Graduates),who could take medical board examination and become ECFMG-certified to practice medicine in the US. As we know, those medical doctors with B.D.M. who had completed the master program in China during 1982-1989, could enter into NIH&#8217;s postdocotral training programs at that time. To be fair about this, it was Dr. Zhan&#8217;s intention to enter into the Fogarty postdoctoral training program, but it was the US government&#8217;s choice to include him in the program for the training.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：星星</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-341</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-341</guid>
					<description>这太牵强了，为什么你就不质疑进化论呢？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>这太牵强了，为什么你就不质疑进化论呢？
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：assdonkey</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-340</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-340</guid>
					<description>边波：：：你有点难为方舟子了吧，目前的科学总量还不是很多，还有很多不能完全解释。这个问题目前还没有完全科学的解释，你就能让方舟子解释到位透彻吗？？方舟子不是万能的，他的知识总量，即使掌握的很多很多，也不可能超过目前世界科学的总量吧！
支持方舟子！！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>边波：：：你有点难为方舟子了吧，目前的科学总量还不是很多，还有很多不能完全解释。这个问题目前还没有完全科学的解释，你就能让方舟子解释到位透彻吗？？方舟子不是万能的，他的知识总量，即使掌握的很多很多，也不可能超过目前世界科学的总量吧！<br />
支持方舟子！！
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：assdonkey</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-339</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-339</guid>
					<description>你有点难为方舟子了吧，目前的科学总量还不是很多，还有很多不能完全解释。这个问题目前还没有完全科学的解释，你就能让方舟子解释到位透彻吗？？方舟子不是万能的，他的知识总量，即使掌握的很多很多，也不可能超过目前世界科学的总量吧！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你有点难为方舟子了吧，目前的科学总量还不是很多，还有很多不能完全解释。这个问题目前还没有完全科学的解释，你就能让方舟子解释到位透彻吗？？方舟子不是万能的，他的知识总量，即使掌握的很多很多，也不可能超过目前世界科学的总量吧！
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：dingdong</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-338</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-338</guid>
					<description>据说尾巴没有了，是为了支援脑的发育；毛毛退化是不是也支援中央去了？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>据说尾巴没有了，是为了支援脑的发育；毛毛退化是不是也支援中央去了？
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：zcx1997</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-320</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-320</guid>
					<description>如果真是性选择，那么猪等哺乳动物有多对乳房，那作为自然界最淫荡的人类，应该发展出多对乳房才是。（可能几百万年以后会进化成也说不定……）

呵呵，这种事情难道是可以理解的？

还有，用自然选择怎么理解那些毛虫的拟态，要知道它可以把自己伪装成枯树叶，怎么可能进化的？还有，浅海的许多海马、海龙可以进化成形态各异的树枝状、海草状。这又是怎么一步步进化的，很难理解是进化而成的。。。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>如果真是性选择，那么猪等哺乳动物有多对乳房，那作为自然界最淫荡的人类，应该发展出多对乳房才是。（可能几百万年以后会进化成也说不定……）</p>
<p>呵呵，这种事情难道是可以理解的？</p>
<p>还有，用自然选择怎么理解那些毛虫的拟态，要知道它可以把自己伪装成枯树叶，怎么可能进化的？还有，浅海的许多海马、海龙可以进化成形态各异的树枝状、海草状。这又是怎么一步步进化的，很难理解是进化而成的。。。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：tiandi</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-337</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-337</guid>
					<description>没有上帝，没有神，只有无限（无限大，无限小）和基因代码。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>没有上帝，没有神，只有无限（无限大，无限小）和基因代码。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>由：老肥</title>
		<link>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-317</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xysblogs.org/fangzhouzi/archives/1346#comment-317</guid>
					<description>请“感悟人生”和拉登小住几天后，他就会理直气壮的告诉我们：人是真主造出来的。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>请“感悟人生”和拉登小住几天后，他就会理直气壮的告诉我们：人是真主造出来的。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
